1. Here is a pro tip: The further you get away from primary sources, the greater the bullshit*

  2. Are you asking from the point of view of an alternate history as presented in the video? Or from a real world point of view as things are today?

  3. No I meant after ww2 korea unified after ww2 it's in the video. 1950s

  4. At least their exploitation helps the middle class. As opposed to capitalist societies where the gains from exploitation are there to keep the middle class barely chugging along while the rich reap the benefits.

  5. Would you agree that if a capitalist nation is getting rich from exploiting a global south nation, that they would want to increase this exploitation so that they get richer?

  6. I do but they have an incentive to look good and not drain it too quickly. They dont want great capitalism for a few decades they want bearable capitalism for a long time which means bleeding the poorer nations low and slow.

  7. I didn't mean the US I was referring to more Scandinavian social democracies

  8. I agree with everything you said, but don't think it will convince anyone.

  9. Do you understand how economics incentives works? There is no inherent right to property, property laws are created to encourage economic development and allow people not to live in poverty because anyone else can rob what you owned.

  10. No idea that's why we have to try. When capitalism was just getting started it failed a couple of times too we didn't give up did we.

  11. This is a really incoherent rant. What are you actually trying to asset here?

  12. That no matter how you try to "fix" capitalism in the end it will still be a bad system for the poor 99% that is

  13. Let me rephrase. What do you think industries are doing wrongly, that they shouldn't be able to do?

  14. Jesus Christ. How do you think we get the materials required to allow you to travel, do stand up, and paint? And who builds the venues where you do stand up, or whatever building you paint in, etc. these three things alone require, what…hundreds of resources to be built or collected or distributed or whatever?

  15. Iam not saying I want to do those stuff as a job but more as a hobby we don't need to spend the majority of our lives working I acknowledge we still have to work but atleast have work that benefits everyone and not just the rich.

  16. More like I should be able to work for myself and the rest of society and not spend the majority of my life working.

  17. Thanks for all the effort really helped can't believe people would warp history like this

  18. A worker's co-operative is NOT socialist. It's just people who voluntarily associate with each other for economic purposes. A different style of economic organization, but not socialist.

  19. Basically it ask for the peaceful transition between capitalism to socialism by building up unions and worker Co-ops. It's a Utilitarian philosophy that slowly overtime workers control their workplaces. The end goal is basically a lazare-faire market socialism. Basically think about the thought experiment John Stuart Mill gave a child drowning in a pond and person standing right next to that pond. The idea is that the person not saving the child because his shoes could get wet or some trivial matter would make that person evil. This is basically the idea applied to society greater as a whole.

  20. No. Mills was the leading influence in the development of classical liberalism, but unlike others who have applied the ideals opportunistically or myopically to support private or narrow interests, he was a serious scholar whose humaneness was not impaired by suffocating ideoligical devotion.

  21. Wait is that a no for socialist or no for classical liberal?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News Reporter