Youtube is showing ads like this for at least half a year, probably longer. Several users here reported it, but according Google (Youtube) the scammer aren't breaking the ToS and thats perfectly fine
I know it goes on for years, but for half a year they don't give a shit any longer - and even make it sound like they are absolutely okay with airing scams as long as they are getting paid.
It shows that, at least at this point, there will be no mass adoption. Even people who are into crypto are not connecting their wallets to anything because they are paranoid
We preserved scalability properties while giving our p2p cash many more use cases. Cash is only as good as the stuff you can exchange it for, and DeFi will bring in the stuff.
Only the largest PoW chain has the security advantage of PoW, so I don't know why you would argue with that. I truly believe ETH with PoS is less secure than Bitcoin, but even ETH is a lot more secure than BCH.
The contract addresses match up ….except for the fact that all the letters in the one from coinbase wallet are lowercase vs the ones from coin marketcap and from the coins website have the same uppercase letters. I’m assuming that’s a formatting issue but could be a red flag idk
ETH addresses are hexadecimal - lower / upper case makes no difference and is used as a check sum mechanism, which is sadly not implemented everywhere. But as long as the letters match everything is alright.
Ok with ETH addresses being hexadecimal - that’s good to hear thanks for letting me know! Also yeah I created a wallet on uniswap and saved my info. Then I was able to send some ethereum and some MAGA (the shitcoin I’ve been talking about) over from my coinbase wallet to the new uniswap wallet. The network fee I was charged on coinbase wallet for sending it was about 3x higher for MAGA than ethereum which I guess makes sense.
Ethereum is a network, and Arbitrum (Actually it's now called Arbitrum One) is a L2 (layer 2 or second layer) network of Ethereum. The gas fees there are a lot lower, but you will only have access to token and DEXes that exist on Arbitrum. That's also why there will be completely different liquidity pools than on Ethereum mainnet.
They openly communicated the formation of a DAO for a while now - it should be obvious no single person can just distribute this kind of money, even TMD alone holds 300k USD right now, this is no joke if you face legal consequences afterwards.
The moons left for distributions are 1M - for all eternity. They can't mint more moons. It's only as much moons as they had for a single distribution back then.
Wrong. We can redistribute Moons which are right now burned for ads like banners and AMAs. During a full bull run this could get close to Reddit distributions, but it's fully sustainable, as these Moons aren't minted, but taken out of the market instead.
From what you show here, you order got executed at a better price than your 0.99 target - I checked the numbers and it looks like the ~10,150 after fees should be correct, making an avarage price of ~0.994 before fees. After fees you should have ~10,089 USD left.
Appreciate your reply! I haven't had any issues with Binance previously, and I could very well be missing something here, but I've looked at the order many times and every time I do the math I just can't come up with any reason why my balance after the trades is $9,668, and as soon as the trades executed I was like "Ummm, why is there so much less than 10,150..."
I just looked through some of my old transactions to confirm the trades are actually working as I assumed here - and I could see nothing surprising. What you receive should be the sum of all (Total - Fee). At least for crypto/crypto trades, I don't use fiat on Binance.
There is no law that requires all our btc to be kycd. Banks and exchanges have kyc duties that are upheld by laws, these laws dont apply to individuals. However banks and exchanges are required to kyc us, doesnt mean its illegal to have non kyc bitcoin.
According to the U.S. Treasury, any U.S. person, including financial institutions, holding blocked property such as ETH from Tornado Cash are required to report their situation to the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). “Once a U.S. person determines that they hold virtual currency that is required to be blocked pursuant to OFAC’s regulations, the U.S. person must deny all parties access to that virtual currency, ensure that they comply with OFAC regulations related to the holding and reporting of blocked assets, and implement controls that align with a risk-based approach,” OFAC outlined.
Just ignore all tokens you receive from unknown sources. They are most of the times either malicious or just "traditional" scams.
I didn't expect this to turn into an ALGO shilling post...
[удалено]
What makes you believe this?
[удалено]
It's an event that happens once in 4 years. Buttcoiners won't understand.
Yeah, no fucking way I'm linking my reddit account to my kraken account. Nice try tho!
The post says to use the form AND comment the number
I've read it through at least 3 times and can't see where it states that
Second last line.
Not sure if scam or just a honest way to lose your money.
Breaking News: CEO of crypto company bullish on crypto
“Buying opportunity” on the weekend when you can’t transfer funds into a exchange
You can have liquidity in an exchange already.
Why not? HarryPotterObamaSonic10Inu is a great name for a child.
Youtube is showing ads like this for at least half a year, probably longer. Several users here reported it, but according Google (Youtube) the scammer aren't breaking the ToS and thats perfectly fine
This has been going on for years. Usually more prevalent during crypto seasons
I know it goes on for years, but for half a year they don't give a shit any longer - and even make it sound like they are absolutely okay with airing scams as long as they are getting paid.
Someone could create a fake website and trick people into using a malicious contract hosted there. There's always risk angles.
You would immediately recognize it by the website asking you for something different than a simple message.
It shows that, at least at this point, there will be no mass adoption. Even people who are into crypto are not connecting their wallets to anything because they are paranoid
Because we have no good and convenient ETH wallets.
THIS IS NOT XRP.
As a BCT Maxi, I wonder: What's the difference?
One smells like a scam, to me.
Makes sense, but whats your problem with XPR?
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System by Satoshi Nakamoto
Here we have it, the obligatory BCH fan who only read the white papers title.
Got it. Skip the title when reading the white paper. Noted.
No, the point was to not skip the content. lol.
We preserved scalability properties while giving our p2p cash many more use cases. Cash is only as good as the stuff you can exchange it for, and DeFi will bring in the stuff.
Only the largest PoW chain has the security advantage of PoW, so I don't know why you would argue with that. I truly believe ETH with PoS is less secure than Bitcoin, but even ETH is a lot more secure than BCH.
No one who isn't high believes Elon Musk could be Satoshi Nakamoto.
˙uʍop ǝpısdn llɐ ǝɹɐ ʎǝɥʇ 'sʇuǝɯɯoɔ ǝɥʇ ɥʇıʍ ƃnq ɐ sı ǝɹǝɥʇ
The contract addresses match up ….except for the fact that all the letters in the one from coinbase wallet are lowercase vs the ones from coin marketcap and from the coins website have the same uppercase letters. I’m assuming that’s a formatting issue but could be a red flag idk
ETH addresses are hexadecimal - lower / upper case makes no difference and is used as a check sum mechanism, which is sadly not implemented everywhere. But as long as the letters match everything is alright.
Ok with ETH addresses being hexadecimal - that’s good to hear thanks for letting me know! Also yeah I created a wallet on uniswap and saved my info. Then I was able to send some ethereum and some MAGA (the shitcoin I’ve been talking about) over from my coinbase wallet to the new uniswap wallet. The network fee I was charged on coinbase wallet for sending it was about 3x higher for MAGA than ethereum which I guess makes sense.
Ethereum is a network, and Arbitrum (Actually it's now called Arbitrum One) is a L2 (layer 2 or second layer) network of Ethereum. The gas fees there are a lot lower, but you will only have access to token and DEXes that exist on Arbitrum. That's also why there will be completely different liquidity pools than on Ethereum mainnet.
ban_3hewdz3rt8nfyak3rdso3u7jxyrotet31n8k5cbj5dh9e41q7tesyk8zwrgm
Yep, then they just didn't admit it
They openly communicated the formation of a DAO for a while now - it should be obvious no single person can just distribute this kind of money, even TMD alone holds 300k USD right now, this is no joke if you face legal consequences afterwards.
The moons left for distributions are 1M - for all eternity. They can't mint more moons. It's only as much moons as they had for a single distribution back then.
Wrong. We can redistribute Moons which are right now burned for ads like banners and AMAs. During a full bull run this could get close to Reddit distributions, but it's fully sustainable, as these Moons aren't minted, but taken out of the market instead.
There is a bug, I can't select all of them.
What exactly is Bitcoin Cash?
Failed fraudulent fork of Bitcoin that claims to be the real Bitcoin, which is also the reason they love being in the
From what you show here, you order got executed at a better price than your 0.99 target - I checked the numbers and it looks like the ~10,150 after fees should be correct, making an avarage price of ~0.994 before fees. After fees you should have ~10,089 USD left.
Appreciate your reply! I haven't had any issues with Binance previously, and I could very well be missing something here, but I've looked at the order many times and every time I do the math I just can't come up with any reason why my balance after the trades is $9,668, and as soon as the trades executed I was like "Ummm, why is there so much less than 10,150..."
I just looked through some of my old transactions to confirm the trades are actually working as I assumed here - and I could see nothing surprising. What you receive should be the sum of all (Total - Fee). At least for crypto/crypto trades, I don't use fiat on Binance.
Moons are not dead, mods took the project over and currently prepare the full relaunch.
There is no law that requires all our btc to be kycd. Banks and exchanges have kyc duties that are upheld by laws, these laws dont apply to individuals. However banks and exchanges are required to kyc us, doesnt mean its illegal to have non kyc bitcoin.
This can differ for some other countries, but in germany you have to verify and record the identity of the buyer, even if selling crypto privately.
Kindly refer me to this law, do you have to do the same when you sell your old tv and other furniture as well?
Yeah if TV refers to a crypto token.
According to the U.S. Treasury, any U.S. person, including financial institutions, holding blocked property such as ETH from Tornado Cash are required to report their situation to the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). “Once a U.S. person determines that they hold virtual currency that is required to be blocked pursuant to OFAC’s regulations, the U.S. person must deny all parties access to that virtual currency, ensure that they comply with OFAC regulations related to the holding and reporting of blocked assets, and implement controls that align with a risk-based approach,” OFAC outlined.
And you think Blackrock, who can hire 100 lawyers without even noticing it on their balance sheet, will have problems clarifying the situation?
POST YOUR WALLET, you coward
My vault is funded on ETH, go ahead
Yeah well I read the site. If you read my post you'll see I just explained what you said. What I want to understand is how this smart contract works.
Everyone can sell, they just pay 95% tax on it. If it's the creator and he receives the tax, he doesn't care about the loss.
What do you mean with manually? And with another router you mean try with metamask for example and not with uniswap?
Without looking too deep into it, recent sell transactions used this contract: