1. Institutions own about 150 million shares so what's the response to that that won't ruin their reputation! Yah we loan out 100 percent of our shares to shorts not great for their optics!

  2. People don’t understand there was no other option, release shares give us a fighting chance or vote no and go BK.

  3. Sell Nanotech Securities go back to otc if you have to, people understand perfectly with a 100 to 1 reverse split done early my take!

  4. They still have 10 million shares available under old contract I thought?Keep it going for awhile!

  5. Plus 100 million profit my guess but depends on the release cycle could be 300 million!

  6. You're incorrect that underperforming revenue streams does not affect the thesis. The thesis becomes moot if the underlying company simply fails at business.

  7. You know how many businesses are not turning any profit for years have debit and trading at multiples of GME! Don't worry you will find out soon if markets crash!

  8. Complete waste of time. Nothing was presented or said that suggests confidence is warranted in the current leadership.

  9. Get printing more currency contracts or sell it Nanotech Securities worth at least 3x the entire company's market cap at present!

  10. Canada could buy it they do all their currency for instance still 30 million left on contract my guess would sell for over book my take! They made it a core business to get around conversation either you can launch an original vertical or you can't it's been 14 years!

  11. Well it's up 100 percent in a few trading days if you were a swing trader that's a fact!

  12. True, but if you were an investor before MMTLP was halted you are 100% screwed. I think the majority of people in this sub are long term investors.

  13. Agreed, as am I but I thought there might be swing traders in here also as it seems they jump in to comment on big downswing but crickets on upswing! They should state they are bitter long term investors or it's impossible to distinguish between that and a shill! Would be better for the forum Heath my take! They probably think form might not be around much longer also!😁

  14. Nope just buy back 100 million obviously no better investment apple did it for 10 years GME can also!

  15. Of course they should 100mill worth for now no better deal and it worked for apple for 10 years!

  16. Remember when AA didn’t dilute ape at 9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2 but sold it for .81 cents to antara lmfao. Then he reverse split all that took 90% of our shares and didn’t dilute at 18,17,16,15,14,13,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5 butNOW is the right time lmfao what a dumbass

  17. Interesting and also interesting no one even mentions the stock is up almost 50p this week. Granted that’s nothing after the split but someone knows something. I don’t think retail is buying right now.

  18. Brda said he wasnt selling but sold shares, and other insiders during the run up that's why it stalled around $12. Seems like they also knew it was closing 2 days prior to the day the said it would actually close -.-"

  19. Unfortunately that's a blip for Wall Street Bros betting with other people's money!

  20. Their path to profitability was shutting down stores and cutting worker benefits. Every revenue generating idea fell flat and now the CEO is using their cash to invest in other companies. None of this is bullish.

  21. You probably think chewy isn't a sound business also and shorted that! Wake up not everything has Nvidia margins! There will be a reckoning my take! Fundamentals are sound they have stock options now also!

  22. Nope they are still profitable, no debit, large cash reserves and there was about a 300 million swing in earnings! Anylasts got carried away with the numbers and while it's too bad the bar was set to high that's their game!

  23. I think it's funny that the IMF is using 90s Africa/BRIC rhetoric here. China's already shown that they're not going to kowtow and play the subjugation game; they let themselves be juiced like Japan in the 80s, but instead of rolling over and accepting a lost decade now that the party's over, they're acting like the US: asserting themselves, pulling every can-kick lever they can find, etc. This is not a good or bad thing, it just is, but the point is that the West needs to accept that this is the reality. 2020s China is not the USSR, it's not a developing country in the 20th century, it's not Japan. Trying to treat it like those is going to rapidly decimate options for maintaining stability. The desperation for "growth" is also galling. They (both the IMF and China) both need more and more if they're going to keep the machine big enough to keep the busted parts hidden and manageable. But China is actually trying to slowly unwind their Ponzi, not prolong it, and it looks like that scares the living bejeezus out of the IMF. Such a huge part of the global economy deciding it doesn't want to play ball anymore? Someone is getting desperate. But this isn't the Fallout timeline, so I hope no one is stupid enough to try to press the issue forcefully. The West needs to start unwinding.

  24. This was a 30 year plan and at the end of it all India China has the largest middle class population now and will figure it out! Countries with low birth rates will fail or be replaced with a new population! These high middle class countries will buy up all the companies in a reverse economic takeover! The US market will become like the Japan market for 30 years! The only way out is to transfer the wealth to the people my take so we can consume harder per capita! That doesn't fit the green narrative though unless we consume smarter!

  25. They’re buying up things in the US at an alarming rate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News Reporter