1. I wouldn't mind seeing each and every US president who has served during my lifetime go to prison. Not in the least bit. It'd probably make the world a better place.

  2. I'm just wondering who you'll vote for then? Serious question, because Trump and Biden are both big supporters of Israel too.

  3. Cornell West. Jill Stein. Voting for either would likely be no less effective than voting for Kennedy this election cycle. The best outcome that may come from voting third party may well be to shock the world with just how many people are willing to vote third party in 2024. 

  4. I’m a little confused… what is a noisemakers purpose? Why would I want people to make statements about my actions?

  5. The purpose is to have a reason to exist. No terrorists and you don't have anti-terror programs. You don't have good press. You don't actually want to deal with cartels, hardened criminals, or people who might actually fight back. So...you do what Nayirah did for the Gulf War. You screech and say that they're tossing babies out of incubators and saying mean things about George Bush. You do what Colon Powell did when he shook around a fake vial that was meant to represent Saddam's yellow cake uranium. You do what McNamera did with the Gulf of Tonkin. You do what the idiot who dreamt up Operation Northwoods suggested doing to Cuba. You screech about how Gaddafi is doling out viagra to his troops so that they can commit mass rape. Well...that's what you do if you're a sociopath in the FBI. Why they operate in such a goofy manner, how and why they get away with it, it's beyond me. It's just stupid enough to actually exist.

  6. Kant Go  Out 50.75  OH  without retaliation and tampering. Can't stay in and sleep without noise harassment either. Almost like someone wants their 999999 and throws a tantrum. I wouldn't want to be an Afgan civilian on the receiving end of that tantrum. I might get beaten to death while sobbing over my slain daughter. I wouldn't even have to fight back. Just sob sob sob and get beaten to death while not fighting back. Glad my girlfriend isn't being harassed. I might get my hand broken with a salt shaker if I were to confront a soldier harassing a woman. Pretty cowardly Mano a Mano. Pretty emboldened by presence of "friends." Does a sociopath have any friends? Or do they have interests? I found Tennessee to be pretty shit myself.    

  7. Intimidating a witness, tampering with a witness, abusing the 911 system, filing a false report, racketeering, those are some big boy crimes. Imagine being a thin blue slime boy and being an accomplice or an accessory. 

  8. https://www.varusteleka.com/en/product/sarma-hiking-socks-merino-wool/56433

  9. They've been doing flagrantly illegal shit since they were the Bureau of Investigation in the 1920s. They are and have been quite literally the American analog of the NKVD or Gestapo. Secret Police security service. Anti-American insurgent occupiers.

  10. "A speech bringing attention to and condemning the shadowy secret societies whose greed causes turmoil and death around the world"

  11. "For we are opposed today by a ruthless and monolithic conspiracy. One that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence; on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations."

  12. NATO isn't that complicated to understand but majority of the public don't know much about NATO. I wrote a comment a while ago here in reddit and I will copy paste a part of it because I think it explains NATO well to people who have these views of NATO suddenly dragging its member countries into wars.

  13. I see that you've taken the time to study the topic and to read the verbiage. I am no expert on the subject, but sometimes I see what I would call possible logical inconsistencies. It prompts me to ask certain questions. I'll pose the question that I asked myself after reading your post. IF the statement is true that there can be no "forcing" of Finland to "take any military action" THEN what is the practical utility that Finland gains by being in NATO? Wouldn't other countries logically shirk their obligations if Finland were to be attacked? Would they merely act like they do toward Ukraine? It was my understanding that the mutual defense clause for the EU is worded in a more ambiguous manner and that NATO's verbiage is more explicit. Is there not an explicit guarantee that an attack on one is an attack on all?

  14. How is Trump responsible for the increase in housing costs?

  15. The trend of ultra-wealthy people owning far more than they need is a problem for average people. Compare vacant houses to the number of homeless people. The people who own these homes are wealthy to the point that they have no impetus to sell them or unlock any utility from their existence. The US housing stock is being treated like fine art or a Swiss bank account. The people who could actually use and care for these homes have no realistic way of "catching up" with the people who come from inherited wealth or who worked mediocre jobs for 40 years back when upward social mobility was a thing. 

  16. Did the US start using the SCAR at all? I thought that was mostly a eu thing.

  17. Countries and their borders are make believe. The value of money is make believe. Debt is make believe. Laws are make believe. People and their actions are real.

  18. Bout to go blast me some nuisance Timur Matsurayev at them "Chechen authorities." Takin' my chances. Wish me luck or not bros.

  19. And how he's giving out viagra to his military and telling them to commit mass rape.

  20. A country can’t join nato while in an active war. Article 5 also doesn’t work like that. It’s defensive. Sending troops to a country and them getting killed isn’t grounds for article 5. Getting invaded or attacked is grounds for article 5

  21. Agree with what you said except for one nitpick about it being "defensive" as a matter of axiom.  Article 5 has only been invoked once. That was in response to 9/11. If we're taking the claims of Al Qaeda being responsible on its face, the Taliban didn't really have anything to do with the attacks. There was a mission creep that occurred in Afghanistan. Instead of focusing on the Khyber Pass(where Bin Laden passed through en route to Pakistan), NATO began aggressive action against the Taliban. Chris Hedges does a better job of explaining the nuance than I can. 

  22. I'd get the fuck out of Israel. Your leaders and general political culture are batshit. Your government pisses off all of their neighbors and tries to rule via terror tactics. Israel is a theocratic ethno-state. Historically speaking, none of that tends to end well. Not worth the drama. If it were me I'd pack my bags and move.

  23. Don't the people who claim to have been injured deserve a modicum of respect? I'm skeptical of the unsubstantiated claims that Russia was the culprit, I'm skeptical of any attempt to politicize the incident, but I'm more than open to the idea that there exist weapons which may use directed flux, sound, drugs, particulates, or light in ways that would appear mysterious. 

  24. Von Braun and paperclip i know. Escapies to South America also. That not even half as much were hanged after Nuremberg i learned more recently. But this i really didn't know. Thanks for the link. Appreciated.

  25. The Soviets absorbed plenty of skilled Germans after the war as well. The inventor of the STG-44 was one that I remember off the top of my head.

  26. The Becker series is intended for survival. The fighting/utility series have rat tail tangs and might break at the hilt with heavy use. 

  27. Now go fight WWIII against Russia for us! After all, they’re giving your beloved CIA and government officials Havana Syndrome! I’m sure you care greatly

  28. More like the CIA is using weird shit on their own diplomats if we're playing the odds. 

  29. Why is Austria lumped in? Ridiculous

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News Reporter